Achieving Long-Term Political Change in the Middle East

by Dov S. Zakheim
Washington, DC - There is a growing consensus worldwide that the Middle East may be on the verge of fundamental change. After years of bloodshed and political stagnation, the Israeli-Palestinian peace process has recovered its lost momentum. The Cedar Revolution in Lebanon has, at a minimum, brought about Syrian force withdrawals at a pace greater than any Security Council Resolution was able to achieve. And elections in both Iraq and Palestine, as well as local elections in Saudi Arabia, have led many observers to hold out hope for a new wave of democracy to sweep the region.

All of the foregoing developments have only taken place in the past few months. For any of them truly to take root, more time has to pass. In the interim, any one of them can be reversed. After all, it is not the first time that the Peace Process generated hope among Israelis and Palestinians. Nor is it clear that Syria is truly prepared to loosen its grip on Lebanon. Various media reports indicate that Syria is already inserting new personnel into Lebanon to replace many of its former secret agents there.

For that matter, elections are not as alien to Middle East politics as some pundits have implied. Indeed, both Palestinians and Iraqis have held elections in the past, while many of the Gulf States have held elections at various times for various assemblies. Nor should it be forgotten that some elections, that took place lately, did not extend the franchise to women.

The key to achieving long-term political change in the region is not an instant recipe that can be conjured up in a matter of months. Instead it involves years of patiently nourishing civil society in all its forms, so as to give people a sense of unity and responsibility, as well as of political empowerment. Political parties are certainly important, but so too are professional associations, cultural associations, labour unions, educational associations and social welfare organizations. Empowering such groups would enable individuals to express their hopes and aspirations in a variety of fora that could then feed into the political process. Such groups could transcend the tribal, ethnic and regional allegiances as well as religious affiliations that form the current bedrock of Middle Eastern society and generally pose an obstacle to societal cohesion.

Civil society in all its forms need not, indeed should not, replace long-standing sources of identity for Middle Easterners. Certainly many Western pundits would like to see secular societies emerge in the Middle East. Yet in seeking such societies, these Westerners are guilty of Kiplingesque cultural imperialism. Just because they have chosen a secular lifestyle does not mean that the peoples of the Middle East must do the same. Indeed, even as Europe has become markedly more secular, the United States in particular has taken on a more religious hue. For Muslims, Islam is a way of life rather than a religion, a fact that Western secularists often simply cannot comprehend. Religious leaders therefore play a very different role in the Middle East than they do in the West, and western notions of pure church-state separation (which in any event overlook the role of European monarchs who nominally stand at the head of established state churches) simply are beside the point.

Nevertheless, while modernity is unlikely ever to substitute for Islam, it need not stand in opposition to it. Civil society can, in fact, provide an effective bridge between Islam, other religions in the region, and the rights and benefits that all freedom loving peoples seek for themselves. By subsuming religious, ethnic, tribal and regional identities within larger commonalities, civil society can identify and nourish needs that encompass nations as a whole and help to provide peaceful channels for the expression of societal aspirations.

A strong civil society is no guarantee of western-style democracy. But western democracy is not the only option for a system of free representative government. In particular, several states in East Asia practice a form of democracy that is quite different from its western namesake. In fact, representative government will and does vary in nature, style and organization from region to region and from culture to culture. What all peoples share in common is the desire to worship, assemble, speak, earn a respectable living and articulate their needs to their leaders freely and without fear.

Current developments in the Middle East are too recent to be called a trend toward realizing this desire for freedom. Achieving it will take time. Nevertheless, if the international community is generous in providing the material, moral and financial wherewithal so as to nurture the various elements of civil society throughout the Middle East, the timeline of progress could be significantly foreshortened. And everyone, not only the people of the region, will benefit if that occurs.

* Dov S. Zakheim was Under Secretary of Defence (Comptroller) from 2001-2004. He is a Board Member of Search for Common Ground.

Source: Common Ground News Service, April 29, 2005.

Visit the Common Ground News Service Online:

Distributed by the Common Ground News Service.

Copyright permission has been obtained for publication.
Women of Tunisia: Let your voices be heard!

The women of Tunisia have a decisive role to play in shaping Tunisia's future. Fatma Ben Saïdane reminds women of the power of their vote and the importance of civic engagement.
"It is not often that we can find a resource that provides balance and fosters Mideast reconciliation, understanding and coexistence. The Common Ground News Service provides all these consistently. Above all, this service provides the most intangible yet most essential of elements, hope for a better future for all the people of the Middle East."

- Ziad Asali, president of the American Task Force on Palestine

It takes 200+ hours a week to produce CGNews. We rely on readers like you to make it happen. If you find our stories informative or inspiring, help us share these underreported perspectives with audiences around the world.



Or, support us with a one-time donation.

Actions Are Needed To Make Peace A Reality
A Simple Plan
Urgent Steps Needed To Sustain The Fragile Window Of Opportunity
Promote Negotiations or Abandon the Two-State Solution
The Palestinian Ceasefire: A Window of Opportunity Looming on the Horizon
The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly
Only Public Support Can Sustain a Window of Opportunity
Palestinians and Israelis Should Talk Amongst Themselves
What to Do with the Gaza Settlements
Learning from Previous Mideast Mistakes
Religion and the Issue of Jerusalem
Religion Must be Part of the Solution
The Direction of Peace and its Challenges
Palestinian Refugees in Lebanon: Worthwhile Steps before Final Settlement
# of hours per week to create one edition
# of editors in 6 countries around the world
# of subscribers
Average # of reprints per article
# of media outlets that have reprinted our articles
# of republished articles since inception
# of languages CG articles are distributed in
# of writers since inception


Other articles in this series

Actions Are Needed To Make Peace A Reality by Nizar Abdel-Kader
A Simple Plan by Hady Amr
Urgent Steps Needed To Sustain The Fragile Window Of Opportunity by Dr. Ziad Asali
Promote Negotiations or Abandon the Two-State Solution by Naomi Chazan
The Palestinian Ceasefire: A Window of Opportunity Looming on the Horizon by Mohammad Daraghmeh
The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly by Khaled Duzdar
Only Public Support Can Sustain a Window of Opportunity by Jason Erb
Palestinians and Israelis Should Talk Amongst Themselves by Shira Herzog
What to Do with the Gaza Settlements by Saad Eddin Ibrahim
Learning from Previous Mideast Mistakes by Daoud Kuttab
Religion and the Issue of Jerusalem by Jonathan Kuttab
Religion Must be Part of the Solution by Rabbi David Rosen
The Direction of Peace and its Challenges by Hazem Saghiyeh
Palestinian Refugees in Lebanon: Worthwhile Steps before Final Settlement by Michael Young