TEL-AVIV—Lately, a new epidemic has been threatening to attack Israel’s public discourse: a peace conference, an agreement with the Palestinians, ceremonies with the US president—diseases from the past we thought we had already overcome. We got used to the comfortable life of no partner, no negotiations, and no hope, and suddenly, the peace virus is approaching again.
The cure that was found for it is rather simple: A dismissive hand gesture, an air of "let that bothersome mosquito fly away from here."
This hand gesture can be seen among government ministers, Knesset members, journalists, and many citizens. "No worries", say ministers in the Labor party, which once upon a time carried the banner of peace, "nothing meaningful will come out of these talks." Meanwhile, the Prime Minister’s Office officials are whispering in every ear, particularly the right ear, that there is no danger of peace, or an agreement, heaven forbid. At most, we will see some sort of vague statement.
Large sections of the public and media are gladly adopting this skepticism, and even adding, with joy almost, great measures of cynicism. There is no chance they will reach any kind of agreement on principles; after all, the gaps are so large. Jerusalem? Ehud Olmert won’t capitulate. Refugees? Mahmoud Abbas won’t compromise. Borders? The settlers won’t allow. Security? The Palestinians are incapable. The US? Bush is already a lame duck.
So, seemingly, this dismissive hand gesture is doing the job. There is no sense that this is an historical moment; the squares won’t fill with protestors, and peace is not approaching after all. However, all of this is just “seemingly.”
If the summit succeeds, the historical turning point shall come—if the principles of a final-status agreement are formulated, and if negotiations are launched on the details of the core issues. Yet it is very possible that the skeptics and cynics are right. Perhaps the deal won’t be reached and the summit will fail. However, even in such a case, we could see an historical turning point—for the worst.
Hamas will say:
"We were right."
In her speech in New York on September 24, Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni said that now is the time. We have been given an historic opportunity for turning the two-state vision into reality, she said, and the next generations won’t forgive us if we fail.
She is right. The current generation won’t forgive either, because the price of failure may be terrible. The peace-loving Palestinians—and this is the majority on their side—will argue they have no partner on the Israeli side, and the only horizon they will see is the one of the fence, roadblock, and settlement. Meanwhile, peace-loving Israelis—and they are the majority on our side—will sink deeper into despair, and with it we shall see the sinking of the hope for a normal Jewish and democratic state.
Mahmoud Abbas will say:
"I tried to accommodate Israel, I agreed to implement the agreement on gradual performance tests and accept an international presence in Palestine. I boycotted Hamas. After all, Israel understands it will never be dealing with more moderate Palestinians than me and Prime Minister Salam Fayyad. If they are unwilling to agree, even with us, on a general document that will be used as a basis for negotiations, then apparently we truly removed the mask from Israel’s face."
Hamas will say:
"We were right. There is no diplomatic path with Israel. All of those on our side who believed in talks with Israel were wrong and deceived others. Only the violent path will bring results. Just like we kicked out the Jews from the Gaza Strip with several suicide attacks and Qassam rockets, we shall kick them out of the whole of Palestine. Fatah has nothing to offer, while we’re growing stronger."
The world will say:
"Apparently there’s really nothing that can be done. The Jews and Arabs are determined to continue killing each other. Just don’t talk to us about joining the European Union, or invite tourists, or ask for investments. If a Kadima-Labor government and an Abbas-Fayyad government are unable to reach even an agreement on principles, they can forget about us. We have other things to take care of."
And what will we be saying?
* Gadi Baltiansky is the Director General of the Geneva Initiative and was Press Secretary to former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak. This article is distributed by the Common Ground News Service (CGNews) and can be accessed at www.commongroundnews.org.
Source: Ynetnews.com, 11 October 2007, www.ynetnews.com
Copyright permission has been obtained for publication.
In this video for the World Economic Forum, Hassan Mohiuddin, member of the Board of Governors of Pakistan’s Minhaj University, reflects on coexistence in the early Muslim community and explains why religious coexistence is vital to the future of the Middle East.
"The articles of the Common Ground News Service give hope that there are people out there who work
on solutions inspired by the need to co-exist in tolerance
and by the hope for a better future."
- Christopher Patten, Former Commissioner
for External Relations, the European Commission
It takes 200+ hours a week to produce CGNews. We rely on readers like you to make it happen. If you find our stories informative or inspiring, help us share these underreported perspectives with audiences around the world.