The Jewish mind in the age of Obama by Kobi Skolnick

CURRENT EDITION | SPECIAL SERIES | ARCHIVES

On the Arab-Israeli Conflict

The Jewish mind in the age of Obama

by Kobi Skolnick

25 June 2009

	Print
	Email

NEW YORK – Before becoming a peace activist, I spent years as a settler in the hills of the West Bank, planting trees and cultivating the soil. Some of my family and friends still live there and I remain deeply connected to them. For this reason, as the Obama administration’s new policies unfold, I am of two minds. I understand the settler perspective, but I have a second view that comes from years of experience working for peace.

My two perspectives are reflected by millions of people around the world. After Obama’s speech on June fourth, one group rejoiced, but for others his words were a dark cloud. For the first group, their hearts were filled with excitement, but others felt the tight grip of fear and distress. Some looked at his words and saw an opportunity to reduce violence while others saw the speech as a vehicle for more violence. Some saw it as an expression of their deepest values while for others the speech challenged the very core of their belief system. One group embraced Obama as compassionate while the other heard in his words an anti-Semitic attack against their sons and daughters.

Is there a bridge between the two perspectives?

For the settlement community, Obama’s speech was the worst news in years. President Obama is living in fantasyland– he doesn’t understand the realities of violence and the hostility directed at the Jewish community. For the rabbis in the settler community, Obama’s speech goes against the divine design, religious mission, and redemptive plan of the Jewish people. It is a speech, which if taken to its logical conclusion, means expulsion from their homes after many years of building a flourishing society.

Although this point of view may be difficult to accept, it is important to understand and even strive to empathise with the settlers. It is an impulse of intellect to explain, blame, or define justice in a way that fits one’s point of view, but all too often this impulse only leads to less understanding and more conflict.

I chose to highlight this point of view because looking back, I realise that for years there has been a lack of true empathy for other points of view among our diverse communities. Our instinct is to try and classify one another and group people into boxes: he/she belongs to the right or left, this person is right or wrong. However, this prevents us from listening empathetically to other viewpoints.

As a former settler, I can say that settlers have been hit hard; they lost many dear people and have been living in fear. The memories of friends and family members killed in the conflict are a daily presence in their lives and the result is not just the building of physical outposts, but also the building of outposts in their memory. From their perspective, the enemy is alive and right around the corner and proposals for peace have only resulted in more death and loss of loved ones.

I believe that behind burning trees and other intimidating messages from young settlers there is something deeper going on. From a non-violent perspective, this violence is a tragic expression of unmet needs. This is not unique in the case of settlers – sadly, many people all over the world act this way when they find their deepest needs not being met.

Thankfully, we now find ourselves in a historic moment. After years of labelling one another and taking a strong stand for one side or another, there is an opportunity to meet the needs of millions of people with all of the complexity that this implies. However, the solution must begin with the shedding of preconceived ideas and judgments about each other, and the understanding that all of us are part of the same community– humanity. Inside each of us is the ability to acknowledge and connect with human pain and suffering regardless of ideology.

Millions, if not billons, of people in the world want peace. However, the definitions of what that peace looks like have kept us apart. The people who think differently are not “Jew-haters”. Nor is President Obama anti-Semitic. In his speech, Obama spoke on behalf of millions of people who want to see peace between Jewish Israelis and our neighbours — a peace that can be achieved through non-violent methods.

We all want to be seen and understood. We all want to contribute to the well being of others and ourselves. Let us celebrate life together despite ideological differences. Let us pour more water on the seeds of life and peace. In this way, we can use understanding and compassion to bring about an end to the conflict.

“The last of human freedoms is the ability to choose one’s attitude in a given set of circumstances”, Viktor E. Frankl.

###

* Kobi Skolnick is an Israeli who was born into a Hasidic family and moved to a radical settlement in the West Bank as a teenager. Today Kobi is a peace activist within a variety of frameworks including the Center for World Religions Diplomacy and Conflict Resolution at George Mason University where he is an associate scholar practitioner. This article is distributed by the Common Ground News Service (CGNews) with permission from the author.

Source: MarcGopin.com, 10 June 2009,
www.marcgopin.com
Copyright permission is granted for publication.


	ELIAV-SARTAWI AWARDS Call for Submissions!


	FEATURED VIDEO Encounter Point’s theatrical trailor follows a group of Israelis and Palestinians who, despite their difficult and often traumatic personal pasts, including the loss of loved ones in the conflict, engage each other in dialogue.


	SPECIAL SERIES Muslims and Jews in each other’s religious narratives.