News ombudsmen at your service

by Jeffrey Dvorkin
Print
Email
Toronto, Canada - It’s not easy being a news ombudsman these days. Some newspapers, especially in the United States, believe that eliminating the ombudsman position is a painful but necessary cost-saving measure in difficult economic times. However, the institution is one worth investing in as ombudsmen are showing considerable strength in news organisations around the world, notably in the Middle East.

News ombudsmen, also known as readers’ editors or public editors, have the unenviable task of dealing with listeners, readers and viewers who feel the newspaper or reporter has made an error in reporting or is biased. As ombudsman for National Public Radio (NPR) in the United States in 2006, I explained to readers how well NPR did by not re-publishing the controversial Danish cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad on the NPR website when the controversy erupted. And I often dealt with listeners who found NPR’s coverage of the second Palestinian intifada inflammatory or lacking sufficient context.

My opinions weren’t necessarily those of management–or of the listeners. And that’s the point.

Why, then, should the public bother to take complaints to an ombudsman? The ombudsman tries to find a solution for a complainant, or at the very least an explanation of how and why something happened. He or she will consider changes to news practices to reduce the chances of the same mistake occurring again. The ombudsman then reports his or her findings to the news organisation and to the public.

So why should a news organisation even want an in-house lightning rod? After all, there are bloggers and citizen journalists who engage in media criticism, so why have someone who might bring the news organisation into disrepute?

An independent, in-house ombudsman is better able to cast an experienced eye on problems and suggest remedies than a journalist or reporter. At NPR, for example, the coverage of the intifada was perceived by many listeners as either pro-Israel or pro-Palestine.
As a result, I commissioned a study that showed how NPR’s reporting could be more balanced.

My recommendation was that NPR start anew by explaining the origins of the conflict. The result was a multi-part award-winning series that went back to the 19th century and the Balfour Declaration. It may not have convinced everyone that there may be –at least– two competing narratives in the Middle East story but it did reduce the invective down to a manageable roar.

I also went on the radio and met with listeners in person to explain that journalism is not about taking sides; it’s about telling a story with as much accuracy and context as possible. This had the effect of helping the public understand what good journalism is.

Studies show that both the public and news organisations value an ombudsman. An ombudsman allows for a media organisation to be more independent by being self-regulating and self-critical—and thus better able to resist outside pressures, whether from governments, lobby groups or economic interests.

It makes financial sense too: legal costs can decline by as much as 30 per cent when an ombudsman is there to mediate a solution before it ends up in court as a lawsuit.

Some major media organisations, including the New York Times, the Washington Post, ABC, PBS and NPR, are keeping the position despite the downturn in the US economy. But others, including the Louisville Courier-Journal—the first newspaper in America to have an ombudsman back in the 1920s—have eliminated the position as a cost-saving measure.

Meanwhile, ombudsmen are being hired in other parts of the world, perhaps most notably in the Middle East. In the past few years, the Organization of News Ombudsmen has welcomed members from Turkey (from Sabah and Milliyet) and Morocco (2MTV and SNRT TV)., and in 2004, we held our annual meeting in Istanbul, which allowed our members to learn first hand about the challenges of maintaining independent media in the Middle East and Mediterranean.

My own experience as ombudsman at NPR in Washington, DC demonstrates why the institution continues to matter. I was NPR’s first ombudsman and worked there from 2000 until 2006. When I first began, I received 1,900 emails of complaint and concern in the first six months. In my last year as ombudsman, I received more than 82,000 emails, thousands of letters and more phone calls than I can remember. NPR’s journalistic standards did not deteriorate in that period. Far from it. It demonstrated that public interest in holding media accountable to quality standards of journalism continued to grow. And NPR was deeply committed to public accountability by being open to suggestions about how to make its journalism stronger and better.

That’s what ombudsmanship is all about: providing the public with the media access they need and deserve. It’s a way to keep journalism honest, reliable and always at the service of the citizens. So while the office is being downsized in the United States, I hope that Middle Eastern and Mediterranean countries continue to capitalise on the office's full potential.

###

* Jeffrey Dvorkin (jdvorkin46@gmail.com) is executive director of the Organization of News Ombudsmen (www.newsombudsmen.org). This article is part of a series on ombudsmen written for the Common Ground News Service (CGNews).

Source: Common Ground News Service (CGNews), 13 October 2009, www.commongroundnews.org
Copyright permission is granted for publication.
 
 
 
 
VIDEO OF THE WEEK
Women of Tunisia: Let your voices be heard!

The women of Tunisia have a decisive role to play in shaping Tunisia's future. Fatma Ben Saïdane reminds women of the power of their vote and the importance of civic engagement.
 
 
 
 
"I have received six questions from several individuals working for the Common Ground News Service. I hope that students and specialists in our university (Al Azhar), as well as those concerned with general intellectual matters, will take note of the effort behind these questions, how they came to be issued only after extensive information - gathering and study that could fill shelves, and after the kind of organized thought that draws connections between various facts and which does not busy itself with the illusions, trifles, and pettiness that upend the edifice of knowledge."

- Sheikh Ali Gomaa, Grand Mufti of Egypt
 
 
 

It takes 200+ hours a week to produce CGNews. We rely on readers like you to make it happen. If you find our stories informative or inspiring, help us share these underreported perspectives with audiences around the world.

Monthly:

Donate:

Or, support us with a one-time donation.

 
 
 
OTHER ARTICLES IN SERIES
Where Egyptian women can go for help
Pakistan's ombudsman tackles injustice and unaccountability
Lebanese ombudsman bridges divisions amongst youth
Ombudsman moving Morocco forward
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
200+
 
 
# of hours per week to create one edition
 
 
8
 
 
# of editors in 6 countries around the world
 
 
30,000
 
 
# of subscribers
 
 
30
 
 
Average # of reprints per article
 
 
4,800
 
 
# of media outlets that have reprinted our articles
 
 
37,307
 
 
# of republished articles since inception
 
 
6
 
 
# of languages CG articles are distributed in
 
 
2000+
 
 
# of writers since inception
 
 
'

 

Other articles in this series

Where Egyptian women can go for help by Sara Khorshid
Pakistan's ombudsman tackles injustice and unaccountability by Mustafa Qadri
Lebanese ombudsman bridges divisions amongst youth by Johanna Hawari-Bourgély
Ombudsman moving Morocco forward by Moulay M'Hamed Iraki